I agree with you. I prefer larger vaginas, they are easier to get into! Vulva size doesn't matter that much to me, although I do find larger labia a bit of a turn on.

Tighter ones are better, it feels better. Smaller vulvas are more attractive, I like tiny little nice pink flaps.

i agree wi sirene, tighter vaginas r better but... too tight is very bad. and i think an average size vulva is better, not too big or small.

but then again i dont particularly care wot it looks like cos as long as it does the job lol:cool:

well, to me a vagina is a vagina. although yea a smaller one feels better u cannot go as fast if you're "blessed" with a larger penis, so the bigger/looser one might be better to work with. hehe, and i agree w/ little me, get 'er done!

I think the whole tight vs. loose thing is really a red herring. Seems to me that they they all open up just about enough to accomodate the penis that's in there, at least if she's reasonably excited. Depending on the woman, her mood and the extent of foreplay, sometimes they're unusually tight right at first, but that doesn't last long and can be more of a hinderance than anything else. Also, if you don't immediately pull out when you're done, but lie still for a little bit, they typically close back down as she cools off (which is worth being careful about, since it's almost like a little hand trying to snatch the condom off).

The question is sort of like asking: lubricated or non-lubricated? I suppose a dry(ish) one would give you more friction, but is that really the right question?

External vulvas (vulvae?) are, of course, more a matter of aesthetic taste. I kind of like cute little ones, but it's not a big deal, and I think every size and "style" (if you will) has its fans. I suppose there's a bit of a practical issue with clitoris size (small, well-hooded ones are, well, uhm, they can be a little hard to find), but that just means that the women with the little ones need to learn to be a trifle clearer in their directions ("uh, wait, no, I meant my left, not your left....")

I had sex with an old whore a few times, she was quite slack. I could go for like 2hrs without cumming cos she was so loose I couldnt feel much.
It was crap really.
She was 34, then I had sex with a 16yr old & man that was damn good. She was so tight & it felt so nice.

34 is not old. 16 is too young.

34 is not old...neither is 40+ the last I knew 16 was considered "jail bait".

Vagina size would be hard to measure just b/c its related to the man's penis size.
A woman might feel "loose" to a man who is smaller (less girth) but the same woman might feel just right to a man of larger girth?

It does depend upon on how thick the man's penis is and how toned the woman is. There is a wide range of variance. But for the majority of men - just getting sex is good enough.

Doing jailbait is not wise.

now see that "jail bait" just kinda depends on where ur from... i mean like i dunno wot the age limit for sex in america is but in britain its 16... therefore... legal and not jail bait.

just thought id add that lol just to clearify tings slightly

Actually ... wasn't this the theme of an episode of "Curb Your Enthusiasm" a year or so ago?

A few thoughts:

- It sounds logical that a guy with a skinnier penis would be more likely to find a woman to be "too loose," but I don't know if there's any real data on the subject. It also seems that vaginas are pretty adjustable, since one that doesn't particularly feel "loose" on a finger can later fit a penis into it without too much of a struggle.

- Seems to me that what it "feels" like is highly subjective in any event, and is likely to be influenced as much, if not more, by psychological and emotional factors rather than physical ones.

- I suppose if all you care about is a tight hole, an inexperienced 16-year-old who really isn't even into it might be a "good" choice. Or you might just limit yourself to anal sex (which, I suppose, also has the advantage of doubling the number of potential partners out there).

In the US legal starts at 18 years of age.

[QUOTE=EvilEvilKitten;163410]In the US legal starts at 18 years of age.[/QUOTE]

It is not that simple, the legal age in the US varies by state and is often more than just a law that says X person can have sex if they are Y years of age. For example in Florida an adult under the age of 24 can have sex with a 16 year old. Florida is not a rare case, in many states the age of consent is 16.

Correct Information, what a wonderful thing.

Yea but girls now a days start having sex at 13, so they'll be all loose and worn out by the time they are 16!! LOL

*is a girl* this is where kegels comes in real handy. plenty of stretch, but you can always tighten back up ;)

kegels? I'm not familiar with that term. Could you explain?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kegel_exercise

the kegels muscles are basically the muscles around the walls of the vagina. its possible for most women to tighten/clench them closed, or to relax them and open the vagina. by clenching them and loostening them often, just like you would any other exercise, its possible to strengthen them and use them to help in sex. it also increases muscle flexibility and keeps you from getting stretched out. i've been doing kegels (without knowing it) since i was about 5 years old, and even though i've been having sex for 2 years now, every time i'm just as tight as the first time. its a very handy skill.

[QUOTE=EvilEvilKitten;163410]In the US legal starts at 18 years of age.[/QUOTE]

Same here in Australia.

[QUOTE=cyclefreak;163594]Same here in Australia.[/QUOTE]

Here in england it's 16.

[QUOTE=sera300;163332]34 is not old...neither is 40+ the last I knew 16 was considered "jail bait".[/QUOTE]

I was 17, it was old to me.
16 wasn't too young, I was 18 & apart from them being immature i'd deffo do another 16yr old, they have the nicest bodies.

35-40 etc. isn't old when you look at a person's whole life, but if you've got a 16 year old and a 40 year old, THAT is too old. my husband and i met just before i turned 19, and he was 32 at the time. we're 13.5 years appart, which doesn't seem like so much when you put it that way, but when you see 19 and 32, it kind of looks like more, but i've always been very mature for my age, and he's an ex-skateboarder/punk rocker, so he acts pretty young for his age, so we get along great.

In general; the new dating trend is for the man to date a woman half of his age...meaning 50 y/o date 25-30 year olds.

Hey sirene: you may prefer a 16 y/o because of their bodies but wait until you hit 40 then what? At 41, I don't consider myself old, nor is my body out of shape, definately not "loose or slack"...maybe the woman you took up with just did not know how to keep herself in shape. Don't judge all older women based on 1!!!!

I think you will find your perception of what you find attractive will change as you get older. I'm 51 now, and I find women to be at their most attractive when they are in their 40s. I would never have thought that was possible when I was a lot younger.

tight is always good and well shorter women are naturally that, babies etc influence that, going from fucking my wife who was a virgin when i met her to fucking a milf i know, well i could fuck that milfs pussy without cumming... not good!

"Love" is not that four letter word. What you describe is YOUR problem, not hers.