| Sponsored Links |
|
||||
|
I do tip my hat to your traditional approach, as there are many things to be learned from tradition, but this all depends upon the individual/couple.
For example: My partner and I often rival what is found in a lot of pornography. We don't aim to, we simply have fun. This being said, we do watch porn together and individually, but our sex life has been this way from day 1. There isn't a distortion, merley different interpretations. We pick up new positions, ideas, and scenarios to play with while watching recreational porn. As far as sex being with someone you've known for a long time, I believe you're confusing two terms. Sex, and making love. Sex can be with anyone, any time, for any reason. It's a filling of primal needs, even within a couple. Love making (making love, same difference) is generally described as the spiritual bonding between two partners during the act of intercourse. This doesn't have to happen every time (I myself haven't yet experienced it fully, but hope to). Sex can be dirty, sweaty, funny, energetic, downright filthy, lusty, even slow, but it isn't necessarily making love, and it's important not to get the two confused. You can have completley raunchy sex with a stranger, or as a couple and still love each other to the ends of the earth, with no reservations (and I'd encourage every couple to, it's fun!).
__________________
Numbing your bum before anal is like putting makeup on skin cancer. |
|
||||
|
You are mistaken in thinking that this media exposure is something new. It isn't.
For example: previous to Reformation, marrying girls off as soon as they menstruated was how it was done and rarely was her husband her choice. But sexuality was something expected and condoned - in men. So pornography etc. abounded. The only difference now - is that WOMEN now have the choice yeah or nay and our sexuality is now being accepted and condoned. Some pornography is being made for women too. If you have read around this site, you will have noticed that we firmly push safe sex at every opportunity. What you are in fact seeing is the effect of 'abstinence only' educaion in schools. Being told NO doesn't work esp for teens who are naturally rebellous as they seek to become their own person separate from their parents. But since they are told repeatedly that condoms do not work, they do not use them. BCPs are being branded as abortificants when they aren't. In the absence of factual information, it is no wonder, youngsters aren't making thoughtful decisions. Blame the religious right, not the media. |
|
|||
|
Hey OP, read about Pompeii and how when it was excavated, the authorities would not let people see the art from the ancient world because it was deemed too likely to corrupt them. Only the "upper crust" of society was permitted to view it. I.e. ancient world pornography was only fit for the consumption of the rich and powerful.
There is nothing new under the sun except that it is more out in the open and exposed to view. Does the media distort things? Sure. Does everyone else distort thing too? You bet. I understand that the media twists and distorts things to make money. That's fairly obvious to figure out. What isn't clear is what is the goal or aim of right wingers or religious pooh poohers? What exactly is it that they are trying to achieve by telling me I'm going to hell for masturbating or looking at pictures of nude women or people having sex? It's not clear to me and I find it somewhat worrisome... |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|