|
Yes, but ......
There is a post today to a woman suffering chronic vaginosis. This is an accurate account you cite but it is not the end all and be all.
You are reading an epidemiological report filtered through a journalist and interpreted by you. Until you dig into all the variables and statistical analysis you really do not know what is being said. But part of it will be that the condom helps but we still do not completely understand recurring vaginosis.
You are a real news hound tody. Many of your posts are subject to what I describe: you interpreting what a journalists asys a scientific study says. Please be more careful. AAnd, relative, you last sentence, it may make no difference.
__________________
Brandye
Don't wear cheap bras!
|