so i was thinking that there must be a correlation between the natural physical size of guys and their dick size. like comparing a naturally larger guy to a narturally skinnier guy. their body parts may be proportionate to themselves, which leads me to conclude that typically larger guys have larger dicks. is this accurate?
idk. thats my logical thought process. and ik there are exceptions.
Really; any man who is able to penetrate a woman (or man :rolleyes:) should not worry about his penis-size.
Instead; scrutinize this site and forum to become an A-class-lover! :)
For those still bothered by size, there's a cure! ;) See: http://www.sexinfo101.com/forum/entertainment/30207-tmi-penis-size.html
[QUOTE=Firmus;275150]Those Lifestyles people could have put the whole penis size subject to bed if they just skewed the "average" range way down so everyone thought they were a bit over average. Personally it used to nag on me regardless of all the logic of it not mattering, till one day I broke down and bought a cloth tape and found out I'm "just" above average. Now it never crosses my mind.
I think it's only an issue because there's absolutely no way to change it. I would wager that if there was a real legitimate way to change size, most guys wouldn't do it but would be comfortable knowing they could if they wanted. Not having the option is what bothered me. Just like how women can choose to add/reduce breast size.[/QUOTE]
I totaly agree, It was the same with me, I obsessed about it day and night until I read somewhere that I was above-average, and I also agree that the possibility to permanently enhance the penis' size would've been good.
Just knowing you can change it if it really is a big deal, if it isn't, fine.
Those Lifestyles people could have put the whole penis size subject to bed if they just skewed the "average" range way down so everyone thought they were a bit over average. Personally it used to nag on me regardless of all the logic of it not mattering, till one day I broke down and bought a cloth tape and found out I'm "just" above average. Now it never crosses my mind.
I think it's only an issue because there's absolutely no way to change it. I would wager that if there was a real legitimate way to change size, most guys wouldn't do it but would be comfortable knowing they could if they wanted. Not having the option is what bothered me. Just like how women can choose to add/reduce breast size.
They are right that there is no correlation; my boyfreind is VERY tall, and pretty average down below.
Which is good and plenty to do his thing, by the way. Stop obsessing, guys!
Please read the very first article listed in the Index.
-doc
You know what they say about big feet right?
Big shoes...
There is no correlation to penis size and body size, height, weight, shoe size, finger size, ear lobe length, blinks per second, brain function.
There are guys who are skinny with small members, and skinny guys with big members. Im 180 lbs, 6 foot tall, and have a 6 inch member. (Varies but around that size) I was that size when I was 5'7" 140 lbs and 6 foot 205lbs. Granted excess body fat can "hide" some of the shaft, it doesn't mean you will naturally be hung if your skinny. Bodybuilders always get the "compensating" joke, but in reality they are generally average to slightly larger, but the fact that they are so muscular, they look smaller.
THERE IS NO DEFINING MARKER FOR PENIS SIZE.
The only correlation between the 2D and 4D is the amount of testosteone a fetus was exposed to in the womb. A male will have longer ring fingers (4D) vs the index (2D)
AGAIN FINGER LENGTH DOES NOT LEND TO PENIS SIZE.
If that as the case most men would have incredibly small dicks.
You site a worthless article. All it did was repeat what I said. The difference in finger length 2D:4D equates to prenatal test exposure. When the difference is greater (I.e. lower ratio) then when they're is a smaller (I.e. greater ratio) between fingers.
The only thing this study showwed was that men with longer ring fingers make more in the stock market. It said nothing about a bigger penis.
Plus the "study" performed involved a flaccid penis. That's an irrelevant measurement since some people are growers and some people are showers. You could be 3 inches flaccid and 4 inches had. Or 1 inch flaccid and 8 hard.
Again please stop prolonging rumors.
I can verify that there is ABSOLUTELY NO CORRELATION between body size and penis size - and I've seen more men, both flaccid and erect, than you've had hot dinners.
Now see that isn't many EEK. I like cold leftovers so I probably eat mor cold meals then most people eat hot hahaha
I'd be curious to see what that'd do for me, I'm 6'4 tall, weight 250 and wear 16 on my feet.
But no, it's well known (for people active on this site, at least) the size of the penis isn,t proportional to any other part of the body.
[QUOTE=trio;274759]Its not the length of the finger but the ratio of the length of two fingers. This article explains it better than I can. [url=http://wp.me/P1V6Ua-1C]Can you tell penis size by looking at the body[/QUOTE]
According to the article I sould take my long ring fingers and large penis (really?) over to Wall Street and become part of the 1%.
In my profession most people have a longer ring finger, even the women.