Have a nice day :) Best of luck where you end up--digger.

[SIZE="4">THIS BOARD HAS HIGHER STANDARDS THAN THIS.[/SIZE] :mad:

This isnt a hook up website. Go to adultfriendfinder or hookup .com to find one.

You did ask if there was a chance of a girl who would let a man lick them dry after urinating. You then went on to say please give a guy his fantasy. This implied you were looking for a girl to let you do this. If you had perhaps asked if there was woman out there who would urinate in a guys mouth, and left it at that, then maybe but you went too far in description because it did sound as if you were asking to meet people.

I am sure that is why doc reacted the way he did as well.

> I am sure that is why doc reacted the way he did as well.

Ducy, I reacted to the post for precisely the reason it was edited by a Moderator. Some of his other posts tend to lack good taste and border on the offensive, in my never to be so humble opinion.

Oh I just realized that they changed the post.

It was a disgusting post. Put differently, state your words well rather then foul...

I do not mean to sound abrasive BUT don't ladies deserve more respect
than that? Not be demeaned or disrespected. Just a thought maybe an
outdated thought but one nonetheless.

I reread also I apologize if I took the thread out of context. Still a
great idea to adore and respect them though.

I couldn't read the original post because it was edited before I saw it, so I can only reply to the post as it now reads and can't draw any conclusions or make any assumptions about what I didn't have the opportunity to read.

Yes, there are women and men who enjoy erotic water sports in all their variety, as the "giver" and as the "receiver." There are definitely women who are aroused by being "cleaned up" by someone's tongue after urinating, as well as those who enjoy providing a "golden shower."

There is nothing inherently weird or disrespectful in water sports so long as both (or all) parties are consenting adults who receive erotic gratification from the practice. Water sports are especially appreciated in "power exchange" sex (BDSM) as a form of discipline, domination, or humiliation craved by the submissive partner. If the submissive partner gets off on that, who are we to judge him or her? Incidentally, water sports are one of the safest sexual practices in terms of HIV and STI infection. Safer than oral sex with a condom!

I often say that everybody has a kinky side whether or not they admit it, and whenever we condemn someone else's kinky side, we open ourselves to equally harsh judgement. And that is the root of so much unnecessary guilt we carry around with us about sex, all this judging about what is right or wrong, proper or improper, acceptable or unacceptable, about how we enjoy and share our sexual selves.

Sex is. Enjoy responsibly, not guiltily.

> I couldn't read the original post because it was edited before I saw it, so I can only reply to the post as it now reads and can't draw any conclusions or make any assumptions about what I didn't have the opportunity to read.

> whenever we condemn someone else's kinky side, we open ourselves to equally harsh judgement. And that is the root of so much unnecessary guilt we carry around with us about sex, all this judging about what is right or wrong, proper or improper, acceptable or unacceptable, about how we enjoy and share our sexual selves.

I believe you've missed the point entirely. Please read the Moderator's comments as to why the post was edited. Please continue reading Sera300's retort, Constantlylearning's and my additional comments. It was his choice of language that caused his post to be pulled.

We were not upset at the topic, only put off by the way in which the boy elected to present it.

DancingDoc,

Perhaps I should have indicated that my last post was directed to ConstantlyLearning's and Digger10's posts on this thread. I was not addressing your posts or Sera's posts, although I had read the entire thread before posting on it, as I usually do.

Since I didn't see the entire OP, I couldn't judge for myself whether it deserved to be edited for "offensive" sexual language. I personally have no issues with any graphic, explicit, coarse, pornographic, or otherwise provocative sexual language in itself.

If I were to edit (censor) any posts on a sexuality website, it would be to exclude misogynist, racist, libelous, threatening, abusive, or otherwise hate-filled discourse about sexuality, but sexual language in any other context is acceptable to this reader. I don't believe sexual language has a "gutter."

The Posting Guidelines clearly state that "relevant explicit language is acceptable, crudity and profanity are not".

We also do not condone or tolerate blatently "misogynist, racist, libelous, threatening, abusive, or otherwise hate-filled discourse about sexuality".

On the other hand, there is the viewpoint that the discussion of most topics (if approached maturely and rationally) can be educational and of ultimate benefit - even if the topic is not a palatable one.

There is often a very fine line between freedom of speech and censorship. Everyone will have a different opinion about what is acceptable - and what is not. The mods are very conscious of this and try to use common sense and a balanced judgement as to what is allowed - and try to give the benefit of any doubt.

This site aims to provide a "safe" and helpful environment where all matters of sexuality can be discussed in a frank and (sometimes) entertaining way. This is a sex information (not porn) site; it is read by visitors of all ages and beliefs. Most posters understand this and self-moderate.

The post that started this thread was gratuitously and unnecessarily crude -therefore it was edited. If ALL posters were considerate of others, there would be no need for censoring - or moderators! :)

Hey sorry doc, I wasnt even paying attention to the context of diggers writing. I was just skimming through it. Im so used to offensive things anymore that it didnt even register. When I look at what the post read, I find that pretty...well for lack of a better term...F**Ked up.

[quote=BTDTWoman;199617]DancingDoc,

Perhaps I should have indicated that my last post was directed to ConstantlyLearning's and Digger10's posts on this thread. I was not addressing your posts or Sera's posts, although I had read the entire thread before posting on it, as I usually do.

Since I didn't see the entire OP, I couldn't judge for myself whether it deserved to be edited for "offensive" sexual language. I personally have no issues with any graphic, explicit, coarse, pornographic, or otherwise provocative sexual language in itself.

If I were to edit (censor) any posts on a sexuality website, it would be to exclude misogynist, racist, libelous, threatening, abusive, or otherwise hate-filled discourse about sexuality, but sexual language in any other context is acceptable to this reader. I don't believe sexual language has a "gutter."[/quote]
BT:

It was really graphically disgusting and could have been written better by the OP with a more tasteful manner...censoring it was appropriate...TRUST ME!!!! The only explanation/fault lies with the OP! No one else.