i have a question mainly for the guys, can you tell if a girl has had sex prior to having it with you. like if i had sex with a guy or used a toy, then an hour later had sex with an other guy could he tell that i had something or someone in me???. does it feel different?
the feeling doesn't change for me, it feels like tight, so i think.
no way!! unless the first guy cums in you and you go straight to the other guy and jump into the sack 69ing theres noway.
why do you ask???????
No, b u t ... I sure hope you bathe in between shots.
i don't let any guy cum in me, but i do get to have a lot of sex between twelve guys, one of them said that he likes it in the morning because im tighter? does that make any sence??
and to the question do i bathe between shots, well first yes, or swim, ect,,
:eek: :eek:
You've already bragged on another thread... but this is the first time you've said you "never let a guy cum in you." Sounds like you are not using condoms.
Great.
[QUOTE=bren321]i don't let any guy cum in me, but i do get to have a lot of sex between twelve guys, one of them said that he likes it in the morning because im tighter? does that make any sence??
and to the question do i bathe between shots, well first yes, or swim, ect,,[/QUOTE]
I'm not sure that's something to be proud of. I've slept with 11 guys in my lifetime and I'm 26, and I am disgusted that I let half of those men have me. Also, what are the statistics? One out of every four people between the ages of 17 and 32 have an STD now? I think that was the new Harvard study I saw at work. Most don't know it. A lot of diseases can remain dormant for a while.
[QUOTE=YourSecretPoison]I'm not sure that's something to be proud of. I've slept with 11 guys in my lifetime and I'm 26, and I am disgusted that I let half of those men have me. Also, what are the statistics? One out of every four people between the ages of 17 and 32 have an STD now? I think that was the new Harvard study I saw at work. Most don't know it. A lot of diseases can remain dormant for a while.[/QUOTE]
Im 35 and have slept with over 60 women in my life time and dont regret any of it. Sex is a wonderful thing. It makes us all feel good. Its a natural thing and I believe its healthy to explore our sexuallity, in my case, trying different "flavors". Ive used protection on the short term ****-buddy relationships, but never with anyone I was dating. I always made sure my lover was "clean" before taking that stance. It feels better without latex tightly "sucking" my dick.
[QUOTE=bren321]i have a question mainly for the guys, can you tell if a girl has had sex prior to having it with you. like if i had sex with a guy or used a toy, then an hour later had sex with an other guy could he tell that i had something or someone in me???. does it feel different?
the feeling doesn't change for me, it feels like tight, so i think.[/QUOTE]
My first g/f was 14 I was 17. We had sex at least once a day everyday over 1000 times over a period of 15 months until I dropped her. Her next lover said, as I later heard, "She was a little loose", probably due to my thickness. So that is that. If you dont have sex for a month your vagina will go to its normal tightness, and no one will ever know. Keep in ming a girls' vagina will naturally adjust to the girth of her lover, after doing it a few times it wont hurt, and feel wonderful. Yes, us guys like tight pussys. Thats just the way it is. As far as using a toy, the girl has to surrender to the thickness, pressure and speed of the thrusting, from her lovers penis. He is now in control because you gave him control of your body. He can thrash, pound, **** hard, and really abuse your vagina. In this case, the human penis controls the tightness or losseness of your vagina. When the girl is in control using a toy, she is in control, but her lover will determine how hard to do it. WRITE BACK!
[QUOTE=ashleyhorny1]no way!! unless the first guy cums in you and you go straight to the other guy and jump into the sack 69ing theres noway.
why do you ask???????[/QUOTE]
Agreed, us guys can detect sloppy seconds.
[QUOTE=bren321]i don't let any guy cum in me, but i do get to have a lot of sex between twelve guys, one of them said that he likes it in the morning because im tighter? does that make any sence??
and to the question do i bathe between shots, well first yes, or swim, ect,,[/QUOTE]
You can feel the wet warm sensation of that hot sperm spashing against your pussy walls. The guys love it too.
[quote=bren321]i don't let any guy cum in me[/quote]
[QUOTE=learst]You can feel the wet warm sensation of that hot sperm spashing against your pussy walls.[/QUOTE]
Comprehension is overrated.
[QUOTE=Browser]Comprehension is overrated.[/QUOTE]
LMAO
It's also been said that "ignorance is bliss." This is a mighty happy thread.
Here's a quote by one of my favorite authors:
"Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know."
E. Hemmingway
Of course, there's always Erasmus' famous quote (this one's for the cynics ;)): "In regione caecorum rex est luscus."
"In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king."
I have used the Erasmus quote for years... and never knew the origin!
I'm not ignorant any more!
Wait a minute. I'm happy.
Something must be wrong!
Did you use the english or the latin?
[QUOTE=WallyLlama]I have used the Erasmus quote for years... and never knew the origin!
I'm not ignorant any more!
Wait a minute. I'm happy.
Something must be wrong![/QUOTE]
HA!
Or very right!
WNL
Browser:
The English. I barely squeaked out a passing grade in Latin, just enough to get the requirement done. (Have been using the quote since high school.)
Irresistible:
You are probably not objective when it comes to me, and I'm glad! :D
In general terms of the thread, I'd argue that being unhappy really isn't very intelligent... and throw in Lincoln's observation that "most people are about as happy as they decide to be..."
Heh. Fair enough. You'd have gotten bonus points for the Latin though. I find myself unhappy at times because I am not so much intelligent (I'm not calling myself dumb ;)) but aware. Still, I wouldn't trade the intelligence or the awareness away just to be happy.
[QUOTE=WallyLlama]Browser:
The English. I barely squeaked out a passing grade in Latin, just enough to get the requirement done. (Have been using the quote since high school.)
Irresistible:
You are probably not objective when it comes to me, and I'm glad! :D
In general terms of the thread, I'd argue that being unhappy really isn't very intelligent... and throw in Lincoln's observation that "most people are about as happy as they decide to be..."[/QUOTE]
My Wally:
I'm not? I wonder what gave you that idea... :) I could say the same about you, my love.
OOOOOO We can be a case in point. LOL
I'm "aware" that you are probably not objective regarding my intelligence.
That could, I suppose, make me "unhappy" because your observation is not necessarily based on hard data and is somehow less credible.
But I rather choose to be blissfully happy that I am loved that much.
Golly, that makes so much sense to me. LMAO
LMAO!
This is why you can take philosophy only so far :)