Depends on the woman; some like uncircumcised some prefer circumcised. It's not like we women have a big choice in what we end up with. If you are dating someone you get what you get!
See my thread on cervical cancer. I think it is a sticky. I recently added a bit on a new test available and I also state that I have never had an uncovered, uncircumcised penis in me - nor shall I.
The data are too clear that uncircumcised men can carry much baggage in those folds and I do not want what can be hiding in there. Personal hygiene is important for all but especially for uncircumcised men. The number of threads here by young men who cannot retract their foreskin completely means there are a lot of young men not able to cleanse properly.
I have read your post, never thought about it before as a concern until I read. I never had an encounter w/a man who was not circumcised; therefore, I did not have a preference. In 20+ years of health care; I have seen maybe 15 men who were not, all being much older men. Perhaps in the region of NYS I am in; it's a more commonly performed procedure? I always understood the benefits were secondary to hygienic purposes and the uncircumcised men developed infections under the foreskin, again in the elderly population.
I do admit, I have read the one sticky; the controversy over circumcision; furthermore, I read your views. Until reading both of these, I never realized it was such a major issue and bone of contention to many posters. Put differently, I never gave it a second thought until it was brought to my attention.
I, personally, am circumcised, and I will insist that my sons are too. It is not a matter of religion, or mutilation, like some make it out to be. It is a matter of health. Just my opinion...
Circumcized, thank you very much. Oral is easier if he is and he is generally cleaner as well. Yes, I have tried both cut and un-cut and I much prefer cut.
I am circumcized and glad to be that way. Again the extra work and care that should be taken for hygiene is the main reason. I like the look of it that way better too.
I like both, but prefer natural. I once dated a guy from Europe who was uncut and really loved it. There is just something more raw and natural about it. Also, the skin doesn't look so tight like it will explode when hard like a circumsized penis does...love to play with that extra skin.
I also like the way the skin on a natural penis stays softer and more smooth. I like the fact that it seems more sensitive than circumsized ones. It makes hand jobs easier, its fun to look at..I can go on and on...
PS: Watching the actual process being done on Youtube will really make you cringe...yikes. I could never do that if I had a son.
Depends on the woman; some like uncircumcised some prefer circumcised. It's not like we women have a big choice in what we end up with. If you are dating someone you get what you get!
Well, sera, yes..... but
See my thread on cervical cancer. I think it is a sticky. I recently added a bit on a new test available and I also state that I have never had an uncovered, uncircumcised penis in me - nor shall I.
The data are too clear that uncircumcised men can carry much baggage in those folds and I do not want what can be hiding in there. Personal hygiene is important for all but especially for uncircumcised men. The number of threads here by young men who cannot retract their foreskin completely means there are a lot of young men not able to cleanse properly.
I have read your post, never thought about it before as a concern until I read. I never had an encounter w/a man who was not circumcised; therefore, I did not have a preference. In 20+ years of health care; I have seen maybe 15 men who were not, all being much older men. Perhaps in the region of NYS I am in; it's a more commonly performed procedure? I always understood the benefits were secondary to hygienic purposes and the uncircumcised men developed infections under the foreskin, again in the elderly population.
I do admit, I have read the one sticky; the controversy over circumcision; furthermore, I read your views. Until reading both of these, I never realized it was such a major issue and bone of contention to many posters. Put differently, I never gave it a second thought until it was brought to my attention.
I, personally, am circumcised, and I will insist that my sons are too. It is not a matter of religion, or mutilation, like some make it out to be. It is a matter of health. Just my opinion...
Circumcized, thank you very much. Oral is easier if he is and he is generally cleaner as well. Yes, I have tried both cut and un-cut and I much prefer cut.
Oops, never mind.
I am circumcized and glad to be that way. Again the extra work and care that should be taken for hygiene is the main reason. I like the look of it that way better too.
I think it is a personal preference, either way.
I like both, but prefer natural. I once dated a guy from Europe who was uncut and really loved it. There is just something more raw and natural about it. Also, the skin doesn't look so tight like it will explode when hard like a circumsized penis does...love to play with that extra skin.
I also like the way the skin on a natural penis stays softer and more smooth. I like the fact that it seems more sensitive than circumsized ones. It makes hand jobs easier, its fun to look at..I can go on and on...
PS: Watching the actual process being done on Youtube will really make you cringe...yikes. I could never do that if I had a son.