Basically, would like to hear your opinions. I’ve read loads of posts about circumcision on the forums and have this question to ask.
Can circumcision be used as a mode of removing premature ejaculation?
The idea is based on the reduced sensitivity and toughening of the skin around the tip. Obviously, there are the factors that unnecessary surgery is always not recommended and there is the potential for undesired results. But surely, there is about the same amount of risk involved as getting a breast enlargement and I don’t imagine a Doctor advising a patient to get one of those.
Just a question to discuss.:cool:
I'm circumcised and never had premature ejaculation, but I don't think it works the same for everyone.
If you are considering having it done to you and other than premature ejaculation you don't have a reason to remove the foreskin - I suggest you leave it as it is.
The process is irreversible and you'll lose the sensitivity the foreskin gives you, which means you'll never be able to feel the same level of arousal again.
Being somewhat of a devout coward, I would not undergo the proceeding unless absolutely necessary.
There are many great tips and tricks and helpful information listed in the Index. Did you read this article?
Squeeze & Training Exercise for Controlling Premature Ejaculation