shortcuts tool bar HOME   CHANNELS   REVIEWS   SEX POSITIONS   SEX ENCYCLOPEDIA shortcuts tool bar

You are here

13 posts / 0 new
Last post
Best lovers?

So I have been searching the net for awhile now doing some reading on the subject and I just cannot find any good research papers or anything like that. But who do you believe is the better lover and cut or uncut male? Some say the uncut some say the cut. I personally am uncut and do not have any thoughts about changing that :) but I am just curious if anyone has any thoughts or knows of some good research that shows which one is the better of the two lovers. Thank you :)

Thanks for the sarcasm :rolleyes: But no I got bored a few nights ago and I read in some articles that one was better than the other both having pros and cons. Just one thing that seemed to stick out most was that males who were circumcised seemed to be able to last longer because they were not as sensitive as those of us who are uncircumcised which I suppose would seem somewhat logical since lasting longer in some cases would be better. So another quick question here again. If someone uncircumcised did kelgels to strengthen the muscles, would they (or me :D) be able to say when I ejaculate?

[QUOTE=Slayer;215724]So I have been searching the net for awhile now doing some reading on the subject and I just cannot find any good research papers or anything like that. But who do you believe is the better lover and cut or uncut male?

[COLOR="Blue">This question in one form or another has been asked and answered many times on this site. The answer is that a person's penis (size, shape, style) does not a lover make. It is not the equipment, rather the owner operator who determines whether he will be or is a great lover. Read this several times.

Another way of putting it is that it is what you do with what you have that counts; more specifically, in having learned what to do. Being a great lover has more to do with the emotions and the psyche than the nerves.

I recommend reading the many how-to articles listed in the Index on what is involved in being a great lover and how to accomplish this.

Whether a penis is natural or circumcised makes no difference to a woman other than in having a personal preference for one over the other. It can very definitely make a difference for men. The nerves in the Glans of an uncut penis are vastly more sensitive. There are also lots of sensitive nerve endings in the Foreskin that contribute to the man's pleasure.

The nerve endings in the Glans of a man who has been circumcised become dull and less responsive over time do to years of exposure to the elements including constant rubbing against clothing. So, as great as the sensations are for those of us who have been altered, the response that you and others feel are much much more intense!

If your Foreskin retracts easily, you have the ability to choose whether to be stimulated directly on the Glans (assuming you can tolerate the intensity) or through the Foreskin and having it involved as well.[/COLOR]

Some say the uncut some say the cut. I personally am uncut and do not have any thoughts about changing that :) but I am just curious if anyone has any thoughts or knows of some good research that shows which one is the better of the two lovers. Thank you :)[/QUOTE]

I hope this is of help. Got questions?

The reason I asked is because some say that cut guys are better because they can last longer. Well me being uncut I do a lot of kegels so that I can stop myself from ejaculating. But another quick question here, are there any uncut guys here who thanks to kegels can last as long as they damn well please?

This has been raised in so many ways, all amounting to whether circumcised or not is the better way to be. The best way to be is the way you are and learning to live with that.

That said, no uncircumcised penis has ever, nor will ever, enter me without a condom. The incidence of cervical cancer in societies that practice circumcision is so much lower than in those that do not. This has led to further investigation that shows that the foreskin can hold lots of pathogens. Circumcised men have less problem with hygiene and there have been many threads about inability to retract the foreskin. If it cannot be retracted, it cannot be cleaned properly.

Back in my wilder days and when condoms were used for all my sex, I noted no difference in performance among partners that could be attributed to circumcision or not.

You say you wont let a uncircumcised guy inside you, what if he has never had any previous partners? Because this is how it is with my fiancee and I. I have never been sexually active with any other woman but her and we do not use a condom. I can retract the foreskin very easily, and I clean it EVERY time I shower so 2 times a day or so. I have been doing that for as long as i could remember because I just thought hey its just another part of my body, why not make sure it is washed and cleaned.

[quote=Brandye;215745]That said, no uncircumcised penis has ever, nor will ever, enter me without a condom. The incidence of cervical cancer in societies that practice circumcision is so much lower than in those that do not. This has led to further investigation that shows that the foreskin can hold lots of pathogens. Circumcised men have less problem with hygiene and there have been many threads about inability to retract the foreskin. If it cannot be retracted, it cannot be cleaned properly.

[/quote]
[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3]There are some studies that show that there are higher risks of certain STD’s among uncircumcised men. But, if you wash regularly with soap and water then there is no difference in the rates of any kind of infection. This includes HPV and HIV/AIDs. The foreskin can act as an incubator if you don’t wash under it. In some countries that don’t have access to soap and water there are much higher rates of STD’s among uncircumcised men. But if you know your partner washes him self then there is difference in risk. [/SIZE][/FONT]
[SIZE=3][FONT=Times New Roman] As to preference to wither circumcised or intact man are better lovers, I cant say because I am pretty much a heterosexual male.[/FONT][/SIZE]

Whoa I am a straight guy who is engaged to a woman lol. Just wanted to get that all cleared up before anyone gets any ideas :D.

After re-reading that I saw it wasn't directed towards me sooooo carry on lol

I am pretty sure that it has more to do with technique than with foreskin.

OK, new question - Who's the better lover: People with black hair or blonde hair? People who wear sneakers or boots? People who smoke or people who don't? Guitar players or drummers? Pizza or Hamburgers? Dog people or cat people? Boxers or briefs? Accountants or insurance salesmen? Red cars or blue cars? Mattresses or waterbeds? Coke or Pepsi? Salt or pepper? Baseball or monster trucks? Sonny or Cher?

How does whether or not you're circumcised make you a better lover or a worse lover? It's about the skills of the user, not the style of the equipment. The only thing that makes someone a better lover is being a better lover...

[QUOTE=Slayer;215784] If someone uncircumcised did kelgels to strengthen the muscles, would they (or me :D) be able to say when I ejaculate?[/QUOTE]

My fiancée is uncut, but he washes and his foreskin retracts fully. He can pretty much last as long as he likes, even if he does it hard and fast or in really good positions. Don't ask me his reason for this, I assumed its just practice. :p

[QUOTE=Slayer;215784]Just one thing that seemed to stick out most was that males who were circumcised seemed to be able to last longer because they were not as sensitive as those of us who are uncircumcised which I suppose would seem somewhat logical since lasting longer in some cases would be better. So another quick question here again. If someone uncircumcised did kelgels to strengthen the muscles, would they (or me) be able to say when I ejaculate?
[COLOR="Navy">
Not necessarily as explained in the article, below. Exercising the PC muscle is great, circumcised or not, as it definitely helps with control; however, control without guidance is like trying to steer a ship without a rudder. A guy must also be able to recognize and associate those sensations that indicate a climax is about to happen. If he cannot, clamping down may not help stave off the orgasm. This is because the tightening action can stimulate those deep seated nerves in the root structure of the penis and cause loss of control.[/COLOR] [/QUOTE]

Please read this:

Squeeze & Training Exercise for Controlling Premature Ejaculation

Hurray For Oedi!!!!

Exactly Right!!

Log in or register to post comments