shortcuts tool bar HOME   CHANNELS   REVIEWS   SEX POSITIONS   SEX ENCYCLOPEDIA shortcuts tool bar

You are here

8 posts / 0 new
Last post
Are periods obsolete?

Women's Health Proponents Recommend Continuous Birth Control Pills

Whether you call it Aunt Flo, the crimson curse, code red, or your monthly visitor, menstrual periods leave many of us feeling bloated and blue. And frankly, surveys suggest, we'd rather not be bothered with them. The fact is, menstruation, as we know it, could be obsolete. At the very least we may only get a period once a season, several leading women's health experts said Tuesday.

With traditional birth control pill regimens, a woman takes hormones on days one through 21, and she takes a placebo on days 22 through 28. During this time, withdrawal bleeding occurs in a timely fashion, like monthly periods. But taking birth control pills back-to-back with no placebo eliminates a monthly period. These predictable cycles are desired by many women for many reasons including social, recreational, and sexual activities.

"The continuous method provides excellent contraceptive protection -- maybe better than traditional," says Carolyn Westhoff, MD, professor of obstetrics and gynecology and public health at Columbia University in New York. Westhoff spoke at a briefing sponsored by the Coalition for Cycle Freedom of Barr Laboratories, Inc. What's more, the continuous method has been shown to lower risk of breast and gynecological cancers, she says.

For years, some doctors have been prescribing "continuous" birth control pills to treat conditions such as endometriosis, migraine, and iron-deficiency anemia. But once there is an FDA-approved long-interval pill regimen, more women will have the option to control their periods, experts say. One such pill, Seasonale, is being tested by Barr Laboratories. With Seasonale, women take the product for up to 84 consecutive days, followed by seven days of placebo. The regimen is designed to reduce the number of withdrawal periods from 13 to four per year.

It's what women want, Westhoff says. "Across all age groups in three surveys, women said they would like shorter, lighter, and less painful periods," says. In one survey, three-quarters of women said they would want their periods less frequently -- or never at all, she says.

What's more, more than 90% of women already taking birth control pills say they chose to take them longer then the traditional 21 days to limit the number of times they experienced periods and 94% said their quality of their life improved by doing this.

Estrogen and progestin are the main hormones in birth control pills. Estrogen causes the uterine lining to grow and thicken; progestin inhibits ovulation and changes the secretions in the vagina that makes sperm less likely to enter to uterus. When women stop taking active pills, the uterine lining begins to shed, resulting in bleeding -- a period. Oral contraceptives were originally developed to include a monthly menstrual periods so that they would seem more "natural," but there is no real reason for it, Westhoff explains.

While not getting monthly periods may seem unnatural, experts say that throughout the centuries, most women did not menstruate as regularly as we do today. In the past, women had an average of six pregnancies and breastfed for one to two years after each pregnancy. Today women average two or three pregnancies and breastfeed for a few months, if at all. In addition, puberty began at age 16 in the past and now the average age is just over 12. Many women in the past had their first birth at age 19, but today it is closer to 25. Menopause, too, occurs later.

Fewer periods are healthy, says Ann Davis, MD, an assistant professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Harvard University School of Medicine in Boston. "It is not not-ovulating that is dangerous, but why you are not ovulating," Davis says. "If you are not using hormonal contraceptives to alter your menstrual cycle and you are not getting your periods regularly, that is unhealthy," she says. Underlying diseases including eating disorders could be too blame, she adds.

Misperceptions about menstruation abound, says Hester M. Sonder, MD, clinical instructor of medicine at Temple University in Philadelphia. Hippocrates, the father of medicine, believed that menstruation was designed to purge women of their bad moods; ancient Roman physicians believed that contact with menstrual blood could turn wine to vinegar; and some myths persist in the 21st century. But, she tells WebMD, the purpose of ovulatory, "natural" menstrual cycle is to establish a pregnancy. Menstruation follows an unsuccessful cycle. "When pregnancy doesn't occur, menstruation does," she says.

But some ob-gyns are not sold on the idea of continuous hormones. "My concern about continuous oral contraceptives is that we don't have long-term data supporting this type of use," Brian Levitt, MD, of Atlanta tells WebMD. For example, "until last summer, women were told that taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT) long-term after menopause could lower their risk for diseases, but now we know that it may actually increase risk for some of the same diseases it was thought to prevent." Levitt did not participate in the briefing.

Source: WebMD Medical News  
March 13, 2003

wow, I dont think id ever take some kind of hormones to control my period. Apart from not having sex during that time i dont have anything negative to say about menstruation. I dont feel bloated or get cramps or nothing that is associated with PMS. But i guess some women who have a hard time dealing with the pain, must find it a dream come true....... I guess to some Menstruation is a pain in the vagina

~Themis~

yes i am on the side of caution like some of you have said and in the last paragraph of the text mentions.... we dont know what the long term effects are of so many hormones for so long.. Heck i'm way paranoid, i have never used birth control except for condoms religiously lol.... but i dont advocate or recommend that in any way for anyone reading this, just saying that is what i have chosen to do. It really depends on lifestyle, like if i was in a different one night stand every weekend then i would use birth control, but its not the case. Not to get into details but there is a blood clotting genetic condition in my family and well the pill among other things increases your risk of blood clots, and it does happen as i see young and middle aged women in the hospital with embolisms associated to hormones. Dont even get me started on the cancer issues.... I just put up with my period, even tho its a good 5 days long on average, and pump myself with tylenol the first couple of days : ) ... wow im rambling alot of random thoughts today, hope its ok to do that lol

Mmm, i've been on the regular pill for over two years and it's workin fine for me. I'm rather terrified to switch to any other method. I dunno, even thoguht having 13 periods a year is annoying, I don't really wan tto put mroe hormones into my body then I have to to stay protected, this is in regard to that pill that gives you only 4 periods a year. And depo scares me, cause aside from the needle, I really like knowing exactly then my period will be, getting assurance that I'm not pregnant every month, also I was told that it starts losing it's effectivness by the end of the 3 months, and I'm too terrified to risk it. Even though I would love to have a baby, I can't have one for another few years

Oh, I take the depo shot and absolutely LOVE not having a period.

I don't feel bloated or uncomfortable. What I feel is very free, not having to carry around tampons or having my miserable cramps. I also don't have to work about taking a pill every day. I'm a terrible scatter brain sometimes, so knowing I'm covered for 3 months is great for me.

I do know women physicians who have been controlling their periods for years this way and I have had patients seek advice or prescription to do this. There remain some unanswered questions.

A major reason for contraceptive failure of hormonal methods is adding an anti-biotic to the mix. I am aware of nothing addressing this issue with long term hormonal treatment to eliminate periods. It may increase or decrease the incidence of pregnancy if some medicines, vitamins or supplements are begun or stopped. The changing views on HRT also are to be considered. HRT is, by definition, in menopausal and post-menopausal women. Younger women would now be using essentially the same treatment, for a different purpose, at another stage of development. We simply do not know what the results will be. If we start at 25? 20? 15?

My period is no more or less fun than any other woman's. It is not the worst thing I have to contend with in normal life. I'll keep having mine, thank you.

I don't like the idea and wouldn't feel safe being on hormones and not having a period. Granted I don't like it one bit but it is the way God created woman to be and I just don't think the research is strong enough to go messing around with a woman's reproductive system.

But I go for the natural in most cases. I have a major distrust of drug companies.

Wow... i really thank you for putting that up.. im still kinda skeptical, but.. serious. no one wants their period.. but i mean it is safe? to not have it? like it doesnt cause problems?

Log in or register to post comments