View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2008, 04:35 AM
sera300's Avatar
sera300 sera300 is offline
Senior Users
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: USA--East Coast
Posts: 9,214
Rep Power: 15
sera300 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blink View Post
Yikes, sera... Please pay a little more attention before responding next time. You've completely failed to answer my actual question, which was: Is that physical damage (sloughing of surface epithelia) significant by itself? It's a given that such damage makes disease transmission easier. Without that concern (hypothetically, let's say both parties are disease-free), does it matter that the epithelium might slough off?


I wouldn't have anal sex period; my question is purely of an academic nature.


Yeah, I've seen Brandye state as much before, and I agree 100%.
Blink perhaps you do not understand even what you wrote: Is this of any validity, the study?

It's based on using a spermicide and scoping people. You ask about is this significant "minus" the STD point? The body will expel the lubricant if it's just silicone or water; add anal friction? Might end up with an a form of rejection reaction; may not. The damage is from the action of anal which the study is not looking at. Look up tissue damage and anal sex; later add a foregn body to a wounded area and look at the degree of damage & risks.

Again tissue damage is significant and why use any foreign product? What to you think is used during a scoping? KY jelly...nothing else and it's used sparingly.

Your question makes no sense. Where did your study point out normal soughing of the skin? It discussed topicals in scoping & long term damage.

Don't act like an fool with is; this of "any significance minus the disease factor? for academic reasons".

Their are small tears during anal...don't need to be a brain surgeon to figure that out.The whole study talks about damage & HIV.

The MAINSTAY of any issue is whenever a foreign body/object/chemical is placed in the human body or onto the human body there is a reaction. It can be damaging, rejected, or damage tissue. Always using the closest to natural is the best. And using practices which the nature intended is best for the body. The less invasive the better; which comes back to the point of KY or water based lubes even for unintended purposes.
__________________
Our backgrounds & circumstances may influence who we are but we are responsible for who we become.

Last edited by sera300; 11-12-2008 at 05:39 AM..
Reply With Quote