|
Gamedawg:
Where exactly are you coming up with this information about sex being a "pysicalogycal" (which isn't even a word by the way) act of dominance? Sex's natural, physiological, purpose is reproduction. It is true that there is also psychological and emotional elements to sex, but it is not about dominance unless you WANT it to be. A woman is not "submitting" to a man just because she lets him enter her. It is more like she is deeming him worthy and ALLOWING him to do so. If anything it is an act of mutual submission, though I would say the word mutual consent and attraction is more accurate.
Furthermore, even if I did agree with your reasoning, I think you are doing a disservice by posting it here and so very unclearly. I can see that you are trying to make a distinction between different connotations of the idea of dominance in sexual roles. However, this isn't exactly a clear cut concept and to those who do not have a decent understanding of sex and sexual roles, the distinction will most likely be easily lost. It will be particularly lost on many of the what seem to be young and/or sexually ignorant males that are so drawn to this thread to post their penis size either for validation purposes or bragging purposes. These males clearly still have a lot to learn about sex and the last thing we need is for these immature and clueless boys to be going around trying to "dominate" girls.
Check your facts, this is seriously flawed reasoning.
|